Tesla’s earnings call ended with Elon Musk framing the upcoming compensation vote as a choice between his vision for the company and proxy advisor recommendations. The stark framing came ahead of the critical November 6 shareholder vote on his trillion-dollar pay package.
The quarterly financial presentation had systematically covered Tesla’s advances in artificial intelligence, robotaxi services, and humanoid robotics before Musk’s intervention. His decision to frame the vote as a binary choice demonstrated his conviction that proxy advisors fundamentally oppose his strategic vision for Tesla.
Musk explained his need for sufficient voting influence to guide Tesla’s ambitious technology initiatives while remaining accountable to investors. He presented the compensation issue as essential for continuing to lead projects in robotics and AI without facing removal based on external recommendations he characterized as misguided and uninformed.
ISS and Glass Lewis became the primary targets of Musk’s criticism, with the CEO suggesting their recommendations demonstrate a lack of understanding about Tesla’s business model and innovation agenda. His passionate denunciation included references to the discomfort of building advanced robotics while facing potential ouster based on what he termed “asinine” advice.
The earnings call concluded with CFO Vaibhav Taneja defending the compensation package’s alignment with shareholder interests. Taneja emphasized that the board committee structured the plan to ensure Musk receives payment only when investors achieve substantial returns, making multiple direct appeals for favorable votes from Tesla’s shareholder base.
